Every adjustment is an afferent input.

Rather than just manipulating for the "crack", the effecitveness of an adjustment must be defined by its longevity.

Ideally, we should never need to repeat an adjustment. If muscle inhibition returns after an adjustment, it means that that issue was not the cause of the inhibition. Rather than adjust the same thing every day or week forever, I would rather solve the underlying problem.

Rather than having a "panel-beating" approach, we do better with an analytical approach to neurological input.